FORWARD
The Frame of Reference: A Curios Bond Between Word and Image *
A “Storied” Structure: De-constructing the Metaphor of Language
A “WORLD” TREE
Now the whole Earth was of One language and of common words…
– Genesis 11:1
A LEXICAL EDIFICE – or THE GROUND-WORK OF BEING? Like a “Portrait” of Space & Time – or just a Riddle Inside of a Rhyme?
THE ENIGMA OF UNITY
The Whole, the Part, and the ONE; as in the “Image” of God 
“The world is a system of inseparable differences.” – Alan Watts
“We are One – but we are not the same…” – U2
A “COMMON” SENSE: PICTURING “THE ALL” OF LANGUAGE
From a Hermeneutic Circle to an Axis of Meaning 
OUR POSITION IN THE WORLD is a lot like the “situation” of a whole unto its part – which in reference to itself – requires some kind of an observer – to tell that there’s a kind of difference. Whereby like a part is to its whole (were it somehow broken down as in to pieces) – as a picture of our “current” situation – this “position” of ours (now ) would equally be the place in which we find ourselves (at present): Wherefore by the virtue of this “image” (which is the order of its lo-gic) – being where we are – we should someway find this “picture” to be obvious.. Therefore cur-rently speaking – as a picture of the present situation – it would also be the premise from which our story (both) departs – and (so) must finally return.. Whereby ONE could also say (according to such a fundamental end): This is where we are – and that is why we’re here. One might even say (according to the LANGUAGE which we have): Such would be the “telos” at “our moment”.
LIKE THE PARTICLE TO THE WAVE: It is simply because both part and whole are members of the very same unity – that in a fundamental way – they would be somehow ONE (and the same). While it is likewise for the moment (being now ) – as chance would someway have it – it appears as if it’s “WE” who bear that testimony. And while to some that’s plain as day – if it also were the premise for our-selves then the simple fact of its ALL would be entirely self-evident (were it not overtly obvious)… So that by working as a whole – and “being part” (i.e. how our manifested end achieves itself, its so-called “golden mean” per se) – it would be somehow in accordance with the fundamental dictates of such a LOGIC… So that likewise – in the end – in its “characteristic” way (such that it is pictured – by “a wording” – of our language) – such a plain (but) working principal could also equally describe (to us) the picture – that’s “our world”… Which would be also just to say: That it is someway to portray (for us) the elemental nature – of the structure of correspon-dence – which in-turn describes our universe; and in some fundamental logic of its own (which is its LANGUAGE) – that would be the role of “human being”.
One might even say – it’s “common” thread …
Continue on to Chapter 1: “THE SPECTACLE OF THE WORLD”
Depiction of the Wall of Jericho, Farhi Bible c. 1366
the telos of history 